HAYWARD v. TD BANK NA
BRETT HAYWARD |
TD BANK NA |
1:2019cv00330 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JOHN H RICH |
GEORGE Z SINGAL |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting without objection #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The defendant shall respond to the plaintiff's complaint by September 20, 2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (RICH III, JOHN) |
Reset Answer Deadline for TD BANK NA per Order No. 8 entered this date: Answer due by 9/20/2019. (lrc) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by TD BANK NA Responses due by 9/27/2019. (HOLBROOK, ANDREA) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting without objection #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The parties' request for an extension of time for the defendant to answer is properly styled as a motion, not a "stipulation." So construed, and although no reason in support of the motion has been given, the defendant shall respond to the plaintiff's complaint by September 6, 2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (RICH III, JOHN) |
Reset Answer Deadline for TD BANK NA pursuant to the Order entered this date: Answer due by 9/6/2019. (lrc) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, for extension of time for defendant TD Bank N.A. to respond to Complaint by TD BANK NA. (HOLBROOK, ANDREA) Modified on 8/5/2019 to change to motion to extend time to file answer (lrc). |
Set Answer Deadline for TD BANK NA per Summons Returned Executed filed on 7/17/2019: Answer due by 8/7/2019. (lrc) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BRETT HAYWARD. TD BANK NA served on 7/17/2019. (RUGGIERO, DANIEL) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to TD BANK NA. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (bfa) |
Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0100-2048934.), filed by BRETT HAYWARD.(RUGGIERO, DANIEL) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TD BANK NA with Jury Demand PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by BRETT HAYWARD. (Service of Process Deadline 10/15/2019) Fee due by 7/17/2019.(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HAYWARD v. TD BANK NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TD BANK NA | |
Represented By: | ANDREA T. HOLBROOK |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BRETT HAYWARD | |
Represented By: | DANIEL G. RUGGIERO |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.