KLOS et al v. BELANGER et al
| THOMAS KLOS and MESENIA GUZMAN |
| WENDY BELANGER, MARY KENNEDY, PENELOPE WHEELER-ABBOTT, EDWARD FERREIRA, MAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT 13, HANNAH KING, MELISSA LYONS-VITALONE, JEANETTE SEDGWICK, DAN CHUHTA, SAMUEL "LEE" HARPER, ROBERT G HASSON, JR, DAVID WEBB, PENDER MAKIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LEO HILL, ERIC HERLAN, VIRGINIA REBAR and MELANIE FRAZEK |
| 1:2019cv00369 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN H RICH |
| GEORGE Z SINGAL |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by THOMAS KLOS (sfw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by THOMAS KLOS (sfw) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (sfw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WENDY BELANGER, DAN CHUHTA, EDWARD FERREIRA, MELANIE FRAZEK, SAMUEL "LEE" HARPER, ROBERT G HASSON, JR, ERIC HERLAN, LEO HILL, MARY KENNEDY, HANNAH KING, MELISSA LYONS-VITALONE, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT 13, PENDER MAKIN, VIRGINIA REBAR, JEANETTE SEDGWICK, DAVID WEBB, PENELOPE WHEELER-ABBOTT with Jury Demand, filed by MESENIA GUZMAN, THOMAS KLOS. (Service of Process Deadline 11/12/2019)(sfw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
