NORTON et al v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO PHYSICS DEPARTMENT et al
| MICHAEL A NORTON |
| JOHN THOMPSON, UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO PHYSICS DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CURTIS and OFFICER MITCHELL |
| 1:2020cv00030 |
| January 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN H RICH |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. No PDF document attached to this entry, to view PDF document, see ECF No 6. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (slg)
|
| Filing 6 RECOMMENDED DISMISSAL OF THE CASE re #1 Complaint filed by MICHAEL A NORTON Objections to R&R due by 4/3/2020. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (slg) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Clerks Office providing Information for Pro Se Parties handout. (bfa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by MICHAEL A NORTON (bfa) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL A NORTON (bfa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OFFICER CURTIS, OFFICER MITCHELL, JOHN THOMPSON, UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO PHYSICS DEPARTMENT with Jury Demand, filed by MICHAEL A NORTON. (Service of Process Deadline 4/27/2020)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
