BAILEY v. BRENNAN
Plaintiff: AMY M BAILEY
Defendant: MEGAN J BRENNAN
Case Number: 1:2020cv00042
Filed: February 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Presiding Judge: JOHN C NIVISON
Referring Judge: JOHN A WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MAIL (Letter and Pro Se Packet) sent to Amy M. Bailey returned as undeliverable. (tcs)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 USM Service Form and appropriate service documents completed and given to the U.S. Marshal Service along with a copy of the complaint and order directing service. (tcs)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FOR SERVICE: The Clerk is directed to prepare the necessary documents for service by the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal may attempt service by waivers in the first instance. If no waiver is timely returned, the Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for service in hand by the U.S. Marshal. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (tcs)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 LETTER to AMY M BAILEY from Clerks Office providing Information for Pro Se Parties handout. (tcs)
February 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A HEARING REGARDING DISCOVERY ISSUE. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
February 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 (Access to document is restricted to case participants only) REQUEST FOR A HEARING REGARDING A DISCOVERY DISPUTE filed by AMY M BAILEY(tcs)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by AMY M BAILEY (Attachments: #1 Letter to the Clerk)(tcs)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AMY M BAILEY (tcs)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by AMY M BAILEY (tcs)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (tcs)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MEGAN J BRENNAN, filed by AMY M BAILEY. (Service of Process Deadline 5/6/2020) (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Regarding Retaliation Claims and Mediation, #2 Notice of Final Action, #3 Interogatories, #4 Agency's Motion for a Decision Without a Hearing, #5 Decision and Order Granting Agency's Motion for Summary Judgment, #6 Designation of Representation Form)(tcs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAILEY v. BRENNAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMY M BAILEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEGAN J BRENNAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?