CARNEY et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE et al
ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ and STEW ART CARNEY, JR |
FRANK L SHEP ARD, AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND, HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE, SCOTT KANE, ALICIA LAMBERT, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON, NOAH LEWEY, TRAVIS YOUNG, JOHN DOE, I, CHRISTOPHER STANLEY, JILLIAN JONES, W A SCHAFFER, JOHN DOE, 2 and RUSSELL WILSON |
1:2020cv00349 |
September 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JOHN H RICH |
LANCE E WALKER |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to ALICIA LAMBERT, W A SCHAFFER. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Summons-Lambert) (jgd) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND, HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE, JILLIAN JONES, SCOTT KANE, NOAH LEWEY, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON, FRANK L SHEP ARD, CHRISTOPHER STANLEY, RUSSELL WILSON, TRAVIS YOUNG. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Frank Shepard Summons, #2 ACMH Summons, #3 Christopher Stanley Summons, #4 Scott Kane Summons, #5 Timothy Richardson Summons, #6 Travis Young Summons, #7 Jillian Jones Summons, #8 Kayla Dumond Summons, #9 Noah Lewey Summons, #10 Russell Wilson Summons)(meh) |
Filing 5 *FILED IN ERROR* Summons Issued as to KAYLA DUMOND. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (meh) Modified on 10/27/2020 to indicate it was filed in error as address for defendant was incorrect (meh). |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE, JILLIAN JONES, SCOTT KANE, NOAH LEWEY, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON, FRANK L SHEP ARD, CHRISTOPHER STANLEY, RUSSELL WILSON, TRAVIS YOUNG.(MARCHESI, PETER) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by SCOTT J. LYNCH on behalf of All Plaintiffs (LYNCH, SCOTT) |
Filing Fee Received from STEW ART CARNEY, JR, ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ: Amount Paid: $400. Receipt Number: 220001512. Method of Payment: credit card. Purpose of Payment: civil filing fee. Date Paid: 9/28/20 re #1 Complaint. (bfa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, JOHN DOE, I, JOHN DOE, 2, KAYLA DUMOND, HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE, JILLIAN JONES, SCOTT KANE, ALICIA LAMBERT, NOAH LEWEY, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON, W A SCHAFFER, FRANK L SHEP ARD, CHRISTOPHER STANLEY, RUSSELL WILSON, TRAVIS YOUNG PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by STEW ART CARNEY, JR, ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ. (Service of Process Deadline 12/24/2020) Fee due by 9/28/2020.(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.