WARREN v. MAGUIRE et al
| STEPHEN WARREN |
| SEAN MAGUIRE, MAJOR CORY SWOPE, SHANNON POOLER, DALE LANCASTER and MICHAEL MITCHELL |
| 1:2021cv00200 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/7/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 5
MAIL (ECF #3) sent to Stephen Warren returned as undeliverable. Reason: Not Deliverable As Addressed - Return to Sender Not at This Address. (jwr)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Change of Address by STEPHEN WARREN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 8/10/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 8/10/2021. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STEPHEN WARREN (Attachments: #1 Inmate Transaction Detail)(jwr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by STEPHEN WARREN against DALE LANCASTER, SEAN MAGUIRE, MICHAEL MITCHELL, SHANNON POOLER, CORY SWOPE. (Service of Process Deadline 10/18/2021) (Attachments: #1 Statement of Claim and Relief, #2 Envelope)(jwr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
