LARKIN v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
| SETH LARKIN |
| AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, SGT JAY, SGT TOMPKINS, CO DREW, CO MCNALEY, CO THORNE and CO DOODY |
| 1:2021cv00373 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/22/2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 1/27/2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 1/27/2022. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SETH LARKIN (Attachments: #1 Letter in support, #2 Envelope)(jwr)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Filing Fee or new in forma pauperis application due by 1/11/2022. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SETH LARKIN (bfa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, DOODY, DREW, JAY, MCNALEY, THORNE, TOMPKINS, filed by SETH LARKIN. (Service of Process Deadline 3/23/2022) (Attachments: #1 statement of claim, #2 envelope)(bfa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
