CLERVRAIN v. DUNLAP et al
| MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN |
| MATTHEW DUNLAP, KYUNGS AUH, JANET MILLS and JARED GOLDEN |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES |
| 1:2022cv00082 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Complaint, filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN. Objections to R&R due by 5/6/2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for "Opposition(s)" or "Criminal Intent(s)" and/or "Malicious" Against Freedom of Speech(s) by the ANT(s) Freedom Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Settlement Agreement(s) Against Secretive Criminals by Invoking the National Regulatory Treaties Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for "Serving Agencies" to Reopen "Questions of Laws" or Facts to "the ANT(s) Redaction Act" "TARA" by "Prohibiting Act" filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for "Right Venue Act" "BE" "Clear Consolidated Act" by Victim of Crimes Against Various Officials Apartheid filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for "Collateral Attacks" or "Compelling" or Opposition(s) Mental Cruelty Act by the Nationality Protective Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for "Manifest Injustice Act" or "Electronic Filing Act" Opposition(s) by Secure Academic Resources Technology Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extention to Appeals Extortion or Compelling Needs by the Administrative Records for Controversies Claims Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Congressional Power and Apex Disposition Concerns by Invoking the Detainee(s) Issues Freedom Treatment Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for "Common Sense" or Access to the Imformative Legal Materials or Opposition by "The ANT(s)" Library Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for "Unreasonable Classification(s) Act" by Compelling Performance Movements on Crimes Mitigating Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for "Alien Status" or "Pauperis Status" or Criteria to Consider by Invoking the ANT(s) Movement Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for "the Answer Act" or "Additional Defendants" Act by the Treaties Movement Protective Act filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against MATTHEW DUNLAP, KYUNGS AUH, JANET MILLS & JARED GOLDEN filed by MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN. Service of Process Deadline 6/29/2022. Fee due by 4/4/2022. PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
