RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC v. ARMAID COMPANY INC
RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC |
ARMAID COMPANY INC |
1:2022cv00091 |
April 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JON D LEVY |
JOHN C NIVISON |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ARMAID COMPANY INC. (STITHAM, STACY) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID SWETNAM-BURLAND on behalf of ARMAID COMPANY INC (SWETNAM-BURLAND, DAVID) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by STACY O. STITHAM on behalf of ARMAID COMPANY INC (STITHAM, STACY) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Complaint. Time is extended to June 27, 2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,,, by ARMAID COMPANY INC Responses due by 6/13/2022. (BRANN, PETER) |
Set Answer Deadline for ARMAID COMPANY INC per order no. 9: Answer due by 6/27/2022. (clp) |
Set Deadlines as to ARMAID COMPANY INC : Per Local Rule 7.1 Notice of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 5/31/2022. (clp) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC. ARMAID COMPANY INC served on 5/3/2022. (SHORTELL, BRENDAN) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Brendan M. Shortell filed by GARY E. LAMBERT on behalf of RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC (Total admission fee $ 100 receipt number AMEDC-2645094.) The District of Maine is a CM/ECF NextGen Court. If PHV counsel has not previously been granted electronic filing rights with the District of Maine, PHV counsel will now need to submit a PRO HAC VICE request in this District via PACER at www.pacer.uscourts.gov (LAMBERT, GARY) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC. (LAMBERT, GARY) |
Reset Deadlines as to RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC: Per Local Rule 7.1 Notice of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 4/22/2022. (clp) |
Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMEDC-2640155.), filed by RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC.(LAMBERT, GARY) |
Filing 4 AO FORM 120: REPORT on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (bfa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ARMAID COMPANY INC. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (bfa) |
Set Deadlines : Per Local Rule 7.1 Notice of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 4/18/2022. (bfa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARMAID COMPANY INC with Jury Demand PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by RANGE OF MOTION PRODUCTS LLC. (Service of Process Deadline 7/7/2022) Fee due by 4/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. D802,155 S, #2 Exhibit 2 Defendants Website, #3 Exhibit 3 Body Massaging Device Application, Full File Wrapper, #4 Exhibit 4 Body Massaging Device Application, Assignment Status, #5 Exhibit 5 Plaintiffs Cease and Desist Letter)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.