DREWRY v. WELLPATH INC et al
| BRANDON DREWRY |
| WELLPATH INC, DAN RITTER, DR ALI, DR NEWBY and DANIEL PORTER |
| 1:2022cv00095 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Reset Deadlines per ECF No. 13 : Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline and Objection Deadline due by 6/17/2022. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Extend Time. Time for Plaintiff to respond to the order granting Plaintiff leave to proceed without prepayment of fees (Order, ECF No. 6) and time for Plaintiff to object to the order denying Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Order, ECF No. 7) are extended to June 17, 2022 By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Extend Time to Respond by BRANDON DREWRY (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER dismissing as moot #10 Motion to Extend Time. The Court recently granted the requested extension. (Order, ECF No. 9.) By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Extend Time by BRANDON DREWRY (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Extend Time. Time for Plaintiff to respond to the order granting Plaintiff leave to proceed without prepayment of fees (Order, ECF No. 6) and time for Plaintiff to object to the order denying Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Order, ECF No. 7) are extended to May 27, 2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Reset Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 5/27/2022. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Extend Time to Respond by BRANDON DREWRY (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 5/10/2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 5/10/2022. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE re #4 Additional Attachments filed by BRANDON DREWRY. Although the Clerks Office has no obligation to review pleadings for personal identifiers, please note that the above-referenced document contains personal identifiers in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1. This will be the only Notice of Violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1 you will receive in this case. The filing party may remedy this violation by filing a redacted version of the document adding REDACTED to the top of the filing along with, a Motion to Seal the previously filed unredacted document. If no action is taken, the unredacted document will remain publicly available. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 4
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS filed by BRANDON DREWRY re #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(mmy)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by BRANDON DREWRY (bfa)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by BRANDON DREWRY (Attachments: #1 letter, #2 envelope)(bfa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ALI, NEWBY, DANIEL PORTER, DAN RITTER, WELLPATH INC, filed by BRANDON DREWRY. (Service of Process Deadline 7/13/2022) (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 envelope)(bfa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
