MURPHY v. BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
| PATRICK M MURPHY |
| BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DANA LNU and PATTI LNU |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES |
| 1:2022cv00116 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #4 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by PATRICK M MURPHY. (Attachments: #1 Progress Note, #2 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Complaint filed by PATRICK M MURPHY. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
PLRA Filing Fee Paid in Full. Receipt #122000138. (jgd)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 5/17/2022. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 5/17/2022. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 2
TRUST ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE construed as a Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by PATRICK M MURPHY. (bfa) Modified on 4/26/2022 to change event type (jwr).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DANA LNU, PATTI LNU, filed by PATRICK M MURPHY. (Service of Process Deadline 7/25/2022) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(bfa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
