GORDON v. ROBERSON et al
| DOUGLAS GORDON |
| DENISE ROBERSON and US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2022cv00386 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Certified Mail Service Returned by Department of Homeland Security on January 26, 2023 as to US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 12
MAIL (ECF Nos. 8, 9, Set Answer Deadlines) sent to Douglas Gordon returned as undeliverable. Reason: NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 11
Certified Mail Service Returned by US Attorney General on January 6, 2023 as to DENISE ROBERSON. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 10
Certified Mail Service Returned by US Attorney General on January 6, 2023 as to US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 9
Certified Mail Service Returned by U.S. Attorney's Office on January 3, 2023 as to DENISE ROBERSON. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 8
Certified Mail Service Returned by US Attorney's Office on January 3, 2023 as to US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (tcs)
|
|
Set Answer Deadlines for DENISE ROBERSON and US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Answers due by 3/6/2023. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to DENISE ROBERSON, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to D. Roberson for U.S. Attorney's Office, #2 Summons Issued as to D. Roberson for AG's Office, #3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #4 Summons Issued as to AG's Office, #5 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney's Office)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR SERVICE: The Clerk will prepare the required summonses for service by certified mail on the federal agencies. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (tcs)
|
|
Summons completed and mailed via certified mail return receipt along with a copy of the Complaint to DENISE ROBERSON, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY. A PDF DOCUMENT IS NOT ATTACHED TO THIS ENTRY. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER from Clerk's Office regarding collection of fees re DOUGLAS GORDON. (tcs)
|
|
Filing 4
INDICATION by Prisoner DOUGLAS GORDON of Intent to Proceed; Prison Business office notified. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 1/4/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 1/4/2023. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by DOUGLAS GORDON (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Inmate Account)(jwr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by DOUGLAS GORDON against DENISE ROBERSON, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY with Jury Demand. (Service of Process Deadline 3/7/2023) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Denise Roberson Memo, #2 Exhibit B - USCS document, #3 Exhibit C - 10/25/2022 Letter to Douglas Gordon, #4 Exhibit C-1 - Envelope, #5 Exhibit D - Individualized Needs Plan, #6 Envelope)(jwr) Modified on 12/14/2022 to include jury demand language (jwr).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
