ROUSSEL v. MAYO et al
| JOSEPH F ROUSSEL |
| WILLIAM MAYO and ROBERT YOUNG |
| 1:2023cv00061 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 JUDGMENT By DEPUTY CLERK: J. Driscoll. (jgd) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting without objection #15 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Without Prejudice. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgd)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Without Prejudice by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL Responses due by 4/7/2023. (mmy) Modified on 3/20/2023 to attach document (mmy). |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Extend Time filed by ROBERT YOUNG. Reply due by 3/28/2023. (LICHTENSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Extend Time filed by WILLIAM MAYO. Reply due by 3/27/2023. (COSTLOW, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE re [11-1] MOTION to Extend Time filed by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL. Although the Clerks Office has no obligation to review pleadings for personal identifiers, please note that the above-referenced document contains personal identifiers in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1. Please also refer to the Information Handout for Pro Se Filers. This will be the only Notice of Violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1 you will receive in this case. The filing party may remedy this violation by filing a redacted version of the document adding REDACTED to the top of the filing along with, a Motion to Seal the previously filed unredacted document. If no action is taken, the unredacted document will remain publicly available. (mlm) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to for 90 Day Continuance by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL Responses due by 3/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Cease Harassment Notice, #2 Email Chain, #3 Photos)(mlm) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by ROBERT YOUNG. Reply due by 3/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Defendant Robert Young)(LICHTENSTEIN, MICHAEL) Modified on 3/2/2023 to remove duplicative attachment description and link to TRO (jwr). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by ROBERT YOUNG Responses due by 3/23/2023. (LICHTENSTEIN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by WILLIAM MAYO Responses due by 3/17/2023. (COSTLOW, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL. WILLIAM MAYO served on 2/14/2023. (mmy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL. ROBERT YOUNG served on 2/10/2023. (mmy) |
| Set Answer Deadline Regarding Summons Returned Executed for WILLIAM MAYO: Answer due by 3/7/2023. (mmy) |
| Set Answer Deadline Regarding Summons Returned Executed for ROBERT YOUNG: Answer due by 3/3/2023. (mmy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; 2 Motion for TRO - On February 9, 2023, Joseph Roussel filed a complaint in this Court against William Mayo and Robert Young, alleging deprivation of his First Amendment rights. Compl. (ECF No. 1). The case caption states: Complaint for Damages & Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Id. at 1. In his prayer for relief, however, Mr. Roussel does not request a temporary restraining order, only a preliminary and permanent injunction. Id. at 14 ("WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully prays that this court enter judgment granting plaintiff... [a] preliminary and permanent injunction ordering Defendants William Mayo, and Robert Young to cease engaging in conduct that deprives a citizen of the United States their right to enjoy meaningful access to the Court and to redress their government for the redress of grievances"). As Mr. Roussel does not demand a temporary restraining order for relief, the Court STRIKES this reference to temporary restraining order from the case caption and will proceed with his request for a preliminary and permanent injunction as soon as Mr. Mayo and Sherriff Young have been served and entered their appearances. SO ORDERED. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (tcs)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER to JOSEPH F ROUSSEL from Clerk's Office re: Service (tcs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to WILLIAM MAYO, ROBERT YOUNG. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to William Mayo)(tcs) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (NO PDF ATTACHED, SEE ECF No. #1 ) by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL Responses due by 3/2/2023. (tcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM MAYO, ROBERT YOUNG with Jury Demand, filed by JOSEPH F ROUSSEL. (Service of Process Deadline 5/10/2023)(tcs) |
| Filing Fee Received from JOSEPH F ROUSSEL: Amount Paid: $402.00. Receipt Number: 322. Method of Payment: Credit Card. Purpose of Payment: Filing Fee. Date Paid: February 9, 2023 (tcs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
