HICKS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
| PETER HICKS |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2023cv00132 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| KAREN FRINK WOLF |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY S. BOLEN on behalf of SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER (BOLEN, TIMOTHY)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Service: AUSA ANDREW K. LIZOTTE has been added to the docket for service and notice purposes only. Pursuant to Social Security Supplemental Rule 3, the Court has electronically sent notice to the United States Attorney for the District of Maine that a Complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security was filed in this case. Pursuant to Social Security Supplemental Rule 4 the Commissioner's Answer is due within 60 days after notice. Answer due by 5/15/2023. (clp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs By MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN FRINK WOLF. (clp)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by PETER HICKS (lcb)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET. (lcb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, filed by PETER HICKS.(lcb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
