CARLETON v. ALMY
| RYAN T CARLETON |
| R CHRISTOPHER ALMY |
| 1:2023cv00233 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
USCA Case Number 23-1540 for #9 Notice of Appeal filed by RYAN T CARLETON. (mlm)
|
|
Filing 11
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE Re: #9 Notice of Appeal, Documents sent to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (jwr)
|
|
Filing 10
APPEAL COVER SHEET Re: #9 Notice of Appeal (jwr)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Judgment by RYAN T CARLETON. NOTICE TO FILER: A transcript Report/Order form MUST be completed and submitted to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The form can be found under the Forms & Fees section on their website at #https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov.NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel should register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at #https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov. Counsel should also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at #https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwr)
|
|
Abbreviated Appeal Record Transmitted Electronically to U.S. Court of Appeals re #9 Notice of Appeal (jwr)
|
|
COPIES of Notice of Appeal Sent to pro se plaintiff with transcript order form Re: #9 Notice of Appeal, filed by RYAN T CARLETON. (jwr)
|
|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT of DISMISSAL By DEPUTY CLERK: Joanne Deering. (jad)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION accepting #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION; dismissing #1 Complaint By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
|
|
Filing 6
Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by RYAN T CARLETON. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 6/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jad)
|
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by RYAN T CARLETON (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jad)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET. (jad)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against R CHRISTOPHER ALMY with Jury Demand, filed by RYAN T CARLETON. (Service of Process Deadline 9/5/2023) (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(jad)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CARLETON v. ALMY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RYAN T CARLETON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R CHRISTOPHER ALMY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
