CARLETON v. PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL et al
| RYAN T CARLETON |
| PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MAINE STATE PRISON, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CO ALAN WINTLE, DOCTOR (RADIOLOGIST), CORRECTIONS OFFICERS MAINE CORRECTION CENTER and CORRECTIONS OFFICERS MAINE STATE PRISON |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES |
| 1:2023cv00253 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by RYAN T CARLETON (jad)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by RYAN T CARLETON (Attachments: #1 letter)(jad) Modified on 6/23/2023 to indicate that Attachment 1 was filed in error (jad).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand, filed by RYAN T CARLETON. (Service of Process Deadline 9/20/2023) (Attachments: #1 attachments to complaint, #2 envelope)(jad)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
