BARNARD v. UNITED STATES
| JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD |
| UNITED STATES |
| 1:2023cv00257 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER denying without prejudice #8 Motion to Continue. There are no matters scheduled or any deadlines for Petitioner to address at this time. The request for a continuance, therefore, is unnecessary. Any objections to this order shall be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Continue by JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jad)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Recusal: Mr. Barnard fails to articulate an objective basis for my recusal and therefore his Motion for Recusal is DENIED. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (jad)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Recusal. Essentially for the same reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Nivison's June 27, 2023 order, I deny Jeffrey Paul Barnard's request for me to recuse myself from this habeas corpus petition. Although I have presided over several matters involving Mr. Barnard, this fact alone does not justify my recusal. As Magistrate Judge Nivison quoted, the First Circuit has ruled that a judge has a duty not to recuse himself or herself if there is no objective basis for recusal. In re United States, 441 F.3d 44, 67 (1st Cir. 2006). Applying this standard to Mr. Barnard's motion, I conclude that Mr. Barnard has presented no objective basis for my recusal. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jad)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Special Master. Petitioner asks the Court to appoint a special master pursuant to 34 U.S.C. section 20144. Section 20144 does not apply to Petitioner's circumstances. Any objections to this order shall be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR RECUSAL - denying 2 Motion for Recusal. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (mnd)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Recusal of Judges Woodcock, Walker and Nivison, MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION to Appoint Special Master filed by JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD. No PDF document is attached to this docket entry. The motions are incorporated within the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. To view PDF document, see ECF No. 1. (mnd)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BARNARD v. UNITED STATES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JEFFREY PAUL BARNARD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
