WITHAM v. HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL et al
| JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR |
| HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT KANE |
| 1:2023cv00336 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER from Clerk's Office Regarding Collection of Fees. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 4
INDICATION by Prisoner JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR of Intent to Proceed; Prison Business office notified. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mmy)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 9/27/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 9/27/2023. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Account)(cjd) Modified on 9/6/2023 to reflect filing date of 9/5/2023 (cjd).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT KANE, filed by JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR. (Service of Process Deadline 12/5/2023) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cjd) Modified on 9/6/2023 to reflect filing date of 9/5/2023 (cjd).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
