PACHECO v. MAINE STATE PRISON
ANGEL PACHECO |
MAINE STATE PRISON |
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES |
1:2024cv00030 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JOHN C NIVISON |
LANCE E WALKER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Petitioner's Reply to Response to Motion re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ANGEL PACHECO. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(cjd) |
Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORD filed in paper by MAINE STATE PRISON. (mmy) |
Filing 4 ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MAINE STATE PRISON. Reply due by 3/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record)(MACOMBER, DONALD) |
Filing Fee Received from ANGEL PACHECO: Amount Paid: $5.00. Receipt Number: 553. Method of Payment: Check. Purpose of Payment: Filing Fee. Date Paid: 2/20/2024. (jgd) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS) |
Set Deadlines: Filing Fee or completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs due by 2/23/2024. (MFS) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO ANSWER #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Responses due by 4/2/2024. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Angel Pacheco. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Packet, #2 Envelope)(cjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.