SMITH v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
THOMAS E SMITH |
FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC |
2:2008cv00114 |
April 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
P.I.: Other Office |
D. BROCK HORNBY |
MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2008. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SMITH v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: THOMAS E SMITH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC | |
Represented By: | WENDELL G. LARGE |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.