SMITH v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
Plaintiff: THOMAS E SMITH
Defendant: FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
Case Number: 2:2008cv00114
Filed: April 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: P.I.: Other Office
Presiding Judge: D. BROCK HORNBY
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2008. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS E SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES INC
Represented By: WENDELL G. LARGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?