ZIEHM v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION
Plaintiff: JOSEPH T ZIEHM
Defendant: RADIOSHACK CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2009cv00069
Filed: February 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment Office
Presiding Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Presiding Judge: GEORGE Z. SINGAL
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 American Disabilities Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 85 Report and Recommendations; granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion to Strike. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ZIEHM v. RADIOSHACK CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RADIOSHACK CORPORATION
Represented By: MELINDA J. CATERINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPH T ZIEHM
Represented By: STEPHEN P. BEALE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?