FORTIN v. WELLS, TOWN OF et al
| MICHAEL FORTIN |
| WELLS, TOWN OF, RICHARD CONNELLY, JACOB TITCOMB, OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF, PATRICIA ARNAUDIN, MATTHEW BUTTRICK and MICHAEL FAIA |
| 2:2009cv00179 |
| May 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT Granting 130 Motion to Amend. Granting 132 Motion to Amend. Denying 140 Motion to Amend. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (dfr)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE granting 82 Motion in Limine ; granting 88 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Lay Witness By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (dfr)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 41 Motion for Leave to File; granting 44 Motion to Extend Time; granting 48 Motion to Amend By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT DESIGNATIONS re: denying 11 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order; granting 13 Motion to Strike By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (mjlt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
