165 PARK ROW INC v. JHR DEVELOPMENT LLC
| 165 PARK ROW INC |
| MAINE AND NOBLE LLC and JHR DEVELOPMENT LLC |
| 2:2012cv00106 |
| March 29, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
ORDER AND OPINION By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER ON THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF SECONDARY MEANING FROM AFTER JUNE 28, 2011 re:denying 70 Motion in Limine By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mjlt)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS CROSS MOTIONS IN LIMINE REGARDING CONFUSION LOG EVIDENCE reserving ruling 69 Motion in Limine ; reserving ruling 77 Motion in Limine By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ON OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED TRIAL DEPOSITIONS By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (dfr)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 55 Report and Recommendations. denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 27 Motion for Summary Judgment; By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Exclude By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (dfr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
