SHUPER v. CHANDLER et al
| ALLA I SHUPER |
| PETER LEWIS, REBECCA CHANDLER, BILL KUHL and JOHN DESJARDINS |
| 2:2013cv00110 |
| March 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS denying 97 Motion to Extend Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal; granting 99 Motion to Dismiss; denying 102 Motions for Clarification; denying 107 Motions for Clarification By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (nrg)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS & WARNING TO PLAINTIFF denying 115 Fifth Motion to Clarify; denying 116 Sixth Motion to Clarify; denying 117 Second Motion to Amend By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS denying 61 and 73 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER ON FIFTH AND SIXTH APPEAL re:denying 53 Appeal from Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court; denying 54 Appeal from Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mjlt)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS - granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (mnw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
