BARRY v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
| PAUL MICHAEL BARRY |
| CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EDITH WOODWARD, DUBOISE, SARGENT, YOUNG, SARGENT and PICKERING, SARGENT |
| 2:2014cv00527 |
| December 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| JON D. LEVY |
| JOHN C. NIVISON |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 108 Motion for Summary Judgment; 112 Motion for Summary Judgment; 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; 135 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (mjlt)
|
|
Filing
135
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 108 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CORIZON LLC, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, EDITH WOODWARD, JANICE CHAMBERLAND, EILEEN MAGEARY, 120 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PAUL MICH AEL BARRY, 112 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, WAYNE PIKE, CORRECTION OFFICER PELLITIER, PICKERING, SARGENT, DUBOISE, SARGENT, YOUNG, SARGENT. Objections to R&R due by 8/15/2016. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 65 Motion to Appoint Counsel. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 21 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 52 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (CLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
