RILEY v. PORTLAND MAINE AREA LOCAL NO 458 AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO et al
| JOHN J RILEY |
| PORTLAND MAINE AREA LOCAL NO 458 AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO and TIMOTHY DOUGHTY |
| 2:2015cv00037 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| D. BROCK HORNBY |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ALTER THE JUDGMENT AND TO AMEND THE COURT'S FINDINGS - denying 85 Motion to Amend. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
83
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (ckb)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT OF PRE-FILING CONFERENCE UNDER LOCAL RULE 56 - Set Deadlines: By November 20, 2015, the plaintiff and defendants shall file any stipulated facts. If the parties cannot agree on a stipulated record, they shall notify the court of their intenti ons to file cross-motions for summary judgment. By December 11, 2015, the plaintiff and defendants shall file their motions and supporting documents. By January 4, 2016, both parties shall file theirresponses. By January 11, 2016, the parties shall file any replies. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
