ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al
| MICHAEL A ESPOSITO |
| SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, WENDY RIEBE, ROBERT CLINTON, PETER BRIGGS, CRYSTAL PERFECT, DAVID K CURTIS, PAUL CUMMING, DENNIS SHIPMAN, JEN PATTON and ERIC SHOAPS |
| 2:2015cv00263 |
| July 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| JOHN C. NIVISON |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 40 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 38 Report and Recommendations and granting 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 32 Report and Recommendations; granting Motion for Relief from Filing a Memorandum of Law 19 ; denying 17 Motion for TRO and denying 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; dismissing as moot 18 Motion Requesting Relief from Giving Security By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 Report and Recommendations and denying 8 Motion to Stop Retaliation. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
