INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE v. MURPHY

Appellee: WILLIAM CHARLES MURPHY
Appellant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Number: 2:2016cv00008
Filed: January 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: Androscoggin
Presiding Judge: D. BROCK HORNBY
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 DECISION AND ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal - By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
July 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PROCEDURAL ORDER REGARDING ISSUES TO ADDRESS AT ORAL ARGUMENT - By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE v. MURPHY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: WILLIAM CHARLES MURPHY
Represented By: JOHN H. BRANSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Represented By: PETER SKLAREW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?