HOWELL et al v. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC et al
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWELL, CHASE MOZZICATO PATZ INC, PAYROLL ETC LTD and RONALD RODE
Defendant: ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC and PAYCHEX INC
Case Number: 2:2016cv00438
Filed: August 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: Androscoggin
Presiding Judge: D. BROCK HORNBY
Presiding Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT - granting 43 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 65 Motion for Leave to File Supplement to Summary Judgment Record. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE - granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying 17 Motion to Strike ; granting 18 Motion to Amend Complaint. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the AMENDED COMPLAINT Document. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)
September 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF RECUSAL. JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY recused. Case reassigned to JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN for all further proceedings By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOWELL et al v. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWELL
Represented By: MICHAEL L. BUESCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHASE MOZZICATO PATZ INC
Represented By: MICHAEL L. BUESCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAYROLL ETC LTD
Represented By: MICHAEL L. BUESCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RONALD RODE
Represented By: MICHAEL L. BUESCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAYCHEX INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?