REDZONE WIRELESS LLC v. NETGEAR INC
Plaintiff: REDZONE WIRELESS LLC
Defendant: NETGEAR INC
Case Number: 2:2016cv00595
Filed: December 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: JON D. LEVY
Presiding Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER denying 46 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
April 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Stay By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (jwr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REDZONE WIRELESS LLC v. NETGEAR INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REDZONE WIRELESS LLC
Represented By: EBEN M. ALBERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NETGEAR INC
Represented By: JOSEPH L. CAHOON, JR.
Represented By: APARNA S MATHUR
Represented By: EKWAN E RHOW
Represented By: JOHN S. WHITMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?