BACHELDER v. MJJM ENTERPRISES INC
| MICHAEL BACHELDER |
| MJJM ENTERPRISES INC |
| 2:2017cv00454 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Androscoggin |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT denying 28 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BACHELDER v. MJJM ENTERPRISES INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL BACHELDER | |
| Represented By: | GUY D. LORANGER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MJJM ENTERPRISES INC | |
| Represented By: | DEBRA WEISS FORD |
| Represented By: | K. JOSHUA SCOTT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
