CHASE v. MERSON et al
| JOHN F CHASE |
| ARTHUR MERSON, ENDEAVOR PROJECT CONSULTANTS LLC, CHRISTOPHER M OCHOA, LAW OFFICE OF CHRIS OCHOA PA, RUSSELL HEARLD, STELLAR ENTERPRISES INC, MARK CLOUTIER, KEITH ROY, ROBERT CLOUTIER and DON PATCH |
| 2:2018cv00165 |
| April 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Portland Office |
| Cumberland |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| NANCY TORRESEN |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT re: 34 Motion for Default Judgment; 77 Motion for Default Judgment By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. Show Cause Response due by 11/8/2019. (clp)
|
|
Filing
129
DECISION AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - granting 83 , 104 & 105 Motions to decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims; denying 109 Motion to Amend Complaint ; denying 119 MOTION to Dismiss the Cloutier and Roy D efendants and Renewed Motion to Amend Complaint; No Action Necessary in light of the dismissal on 120 Motion to Stay, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 122 Motion for Attorney Fees. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
113
PROCEDURAL ORDER. Status Report due by 7/19/2019. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)
|
|
Filing
107
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS DON PATCH'S, KEITH ROY'S, ARTHUR MERSON'S, AND ENDEAVOR PROJECT CONSULTANTS LLC'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS - granting in part and reserving ruling in part on 83 Motion to Dismiss, 104 Motion to Dismiss and 105 Motion to Dismiss. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
102
PROCEDURAL ORDER re 83 MOTION to Dismiss filed by DON PATCH. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER ON CLOUTIER DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES denying 87 Motion for Attorney Fees By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
|
|
Filing
84
DECISION AND ORDER ON CLOUTIER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS granting 61 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 61 Motion for Costs, Motion for Attorney Fees, the application shall be made in accordance with Local Rule 54.2. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
|
|
Filing
81
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION FOR EX PARTE ATTACHMENT (unsealed on 1/25/19) 3 EX PARTE MOTION For Attachment By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (mjlt)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ARTHUR MERSON AND ENDEAVOR PROJECT CONSULTANTS, LLC - denying 50 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 60 Renewed Motion for Entry of Default ; denying 60 Motion for Default Judgment. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS, AUTHORIZE SERVICE BY ALTERNATE MEANS - granting 43 Motion to Extend Time; granting 43 Motion to Authorize Service by Alternate Means. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS AND TO AUTHORIZE SERVICE BY PUBLICATION - granting 37 Motion to Extend Time; denying 37 Motion for Service by Publication. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER on 15 Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment and 12 Motion to Extend Time to File Answer By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (jwr) Modified on 7/16/2018 to correctly link to motions (jwr).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
