KENDRICK v. MAINE MEDICAL CENTER et al
| SUSAN KENDRICK |
| MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, MAINE HEALTH and MAINEHEALTH |
| 2:2019cv00028 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN H RICH |
| GEORGE Z SINGAL |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 7/17/2019. Written Notice of Intent to File Summary Judgment Motion and Request for Pre-Filing Conference due by 7/24/2019. Motions due by 8/7/2019. Ready for Trial on 10/7/2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (lrc)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, and Affirmative Defenses by MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, MAINEHEALTH.(SCHNEIDER, RONALD) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MAINE HEALTH, MAINE MEDICAL CENTER. (SCHNEIDER, RONALD) Modified on 2/15/2019 to reflect that this is an Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement (lrc). |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MAINE HEALTH, MAINE MEDICAL CENTER. (SCHNEIDER, RONALD) |
| Reset Answer Deadline for MAINE MEDICAL CENTER and MAINE HEALTH per Order No. 8 entered on 1/24/2019: Answers due by 2/26/2019. (lrc) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting without objection #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The defendants shall respond to the plaintiff's complaint by February 26, 2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (RICH III, JOHN)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by MAINE HEALTH, MAINE MEDICAL CENTER Responses due by 2/14/2019. (SCHNEIDER, RONALD) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by RONALD W. SCHNEIDER, JR on behalf of MAINE HEALTH, MAINE MEDICAL CENTER (SCHNEIDER, RONALD) |
| Set Deadlines : Per Local Rule 7.1 Notice of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure Statement from defendants due by 2/7/2019. (lrc) |
| Set Answer Deadline for MAINE MEDICAL CENTER - Per Summons Returned Executed #5: Answer due by 2/5/2019. (mnw) |
| Set Answer Deadline for MAINE HEALTH - Per Summons Returned Executed #4: Answer due by 2/5/2019. (mnw) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SUSAN KENDRICK. MAINE MEDICAL CENTER served on 1/15/2019. (TOWNSEND, ALLAN) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SUSAN KENDRICK. MAINE HEALTH served on 1/15/2019. (TOWNSEND, ALLAN) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MAINE MEDICAL CENTER. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to MaineHealth)(mjlt) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (mjlt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MAINE HEALTH, MAINE MEDICAL CENTER with Jury Demand PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by SUSAN KENDRICK. (Service of Process Deadline 4/11/2019) Fee due by 1/14/2019.(mjlt) |
| Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0100-1957631.), filed by SUSAN KENDRICK.(TOWNSEND, ALLAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
