ADAMS v. A DUIE PYLE INC
| SARAH ADAMS |
| A DUIE PYLE INC |
| 2:2019cv00148 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| JOHN A WOODCOCK |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/29/2019. Written Notice of Intent to File Summary Judgment Motion and Request for Pre-Filing Conference due by 11/5/2019. Motions due by 11/19/2019. Ready for Trial on 2/3/2020. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Lee E. Tankle, Christopher J. Moran filed by TAWNY L. ALVAREZ on behalf of A DUIE PYLE INC (Total admission fee $ 200 receipt number 0100-2032862.) (Attachments: #1 Christopher J. Moran)(ALVAREZ, TAWNY) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by A DUIE PYLE INC.(ALVAREZ, TAWNY) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT A. Duie Pyle, Inc. by A DUIE PYLE INC. (ALVAREZ, TAWNY) |
| Filing 5 **FILED IN ERROR** CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Christopher J. Moran by A DUIE PYLE INC. (ALVAREZ, TAWNY) Modified on 6/11/2019 to mark as filed in error. Counsel have been instructed to re-file as Certification for Admission Pro Hac Vice(sfw). |
| Filing 4 **FILED IN ERROR** CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Lee Tankle by A DUIE PYLE INC. (ALVAREZ, TAWNY) Modified on 6/11/2019 to indicate this was filed in error. Counsel have been instructed to re-file as Certification for Admission Pro Hac Vice(sfw). |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed A DUIE PYLE INC waiver sent on 4/11/2019. (CLIFFORD, JAMES) |
| Set Answer Deadline Regarding Complaint, for A DUIE PYLE INC : Answer due by 6/10/2019. (sfw) |
| Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0100-2004660.), filed by SARAH ADAMS.(CLIFFORD, JAMES) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A DUIE PYLE INC with Jury Demand PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by SARAH ADAMS. (Service of Process Deadline 7/9/2019) Fee due by 4/12/2019.(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ADAMS v. A DUIE PYLE INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SARAH ADAMS | |
| Represented By: | ANDREW P. COTTER |
| Represented By: | JAMES A. CLIFFORD |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: A DUIE PYLE INC | |
| Represented By: | LEE E. TANKLE |
| Represented By: | TAWNY L. ALVAREZ |
| Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER J. MORAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
