CASEY et al v. TOWN OF YARMOUTH
| MEGHAN CASEY, THOMAS REINSBOROUGH, MARK REINSBOROUGH, ELIZABETH REINSBOROUGH, DAVID RAY and KATHRYN SHARPLESS |
| TOWN OF YARMOUTH |
| 2:2019cv00392 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| GEORGE Z SINGAL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed TOWN OF YARMOUTH waiver sent on 9/6/2019. (HEIDEN, ZACHARY) |
| Set Answer Deadline for TOWN OF YARMOUTH per Waiver of Service filed on this date: Answer due by 11/5/2019. (lrc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (mlm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TOWN OF YARMOUTH PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by DAVID RAY, MEGHAN CASEY, ELIZABETH REINSBOROUGH, KATHRYN SHARPLESS, THOMAS REINSBOROUGH, MARK REINSBOROUGH. (Service of Process Deadline 11/25/2019) Fee due by 8/29/2019.(mlm) |
| Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0100-2069417.), filed by DAVID RAY, MEGHAN CASEY, ELIZABETH REINSBOROUGH, KATHRYN SHARPLESS, THOMAS REINSBOROUGH, MARK REINSBOROUGH.(HEIDEN, ZACHARY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
