DOYLE v. BABINE, COUNCILOR et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A DOYLE
Defendant: SHAWN BABINE, COUNCILOR, MARY PEARSON and MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH MAINE
Case Number: 2:2019cv00469
Filed: October 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Presiding Judge: JON D LEVY
Referring Judge: JOHN C NIVISON
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FOR SERVICE: The Clerk is directed to prepare the necessary documents for service by the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal may attempt service by waivers in the first instance. If no waiver(s) are timely returned, the Clerk is directed to prepare summons(es) for service in hand by the U.S. Marshal. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (mnw)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order USM Service Form 285 and appropriate Service Documents completed and given to the U.S. Marshal Service along with a copy of the Complaint and Order Directing Service. (mnw)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned by MICHAEL A DOYLE. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Shawn Babine, #2 Summons as to Town of Scarborough)(akr)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 LETTER from Clerks Office providing Information for Pro Se Parties handout. (bfa)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL A DOYLE (bfa) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/17/2019 to include second page) (bfa). Modified on 10/17/2019 (bfa).
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by MICHAEL A DOYLE (bfa)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHAWN BABINE, COUNCILOR, MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH MAINE, MARY PEARSON with Jury Demand, filed by MICHAEL A DOYLE. (Service of Process Deadline 1/14/2020)(bfa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DOYLE v. BABINE, COUNCILOR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAWN BABINE, COUNCILOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARY PEARSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH MAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A DOYLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?