MCCURDY v. STATE OF MAINE
| PRESCOTT MCCURDY |
| STATE OF MAINE |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES |
| 2:2019cv00511 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by PRESCOTT MCCURDY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwr) |
| Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORD by STATE OF MAINE (1 binder). (jwr) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by STATE OF MAINE. Reply due by 12/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record)(MACOMBER, DONALD) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO ANSWER #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Responses due by 1/6/2020. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
| Filing Fee Received from PRESCOTT MCCURDY: Amount Paid: $5. Receipt Number: 220000155. Method of Payment: check. Purpose of Payment: filing fee. Date Paid: 11/4/2019 re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (bfa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PRESCOTT MCCURDY. (Attachments: #1 order on petition, #2 envelope)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
