LANGEVIN v. DEARBORN NATIONAL et al
SHERYL LANGEVIN |
HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION and DEARBORN NATIONAL |
2:2021cv00060 |
February 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JON D LEVY |
JOHN H RICH |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 7/21/2021. Written Notice of Intent to File Summary Judgment Motion and Request for Pre-Filing Conference due by 7/28/2021. Motions due by 8/11/2021. Ready for Trial on 10/4/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (aks) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION.(ERWIN, JAMES) |
Reset Deadlines : Maine has transitioned to the NextGen ECF filing system; therefore, to complete the admissions process, Attorneys JILL S. VOROBIEV and JOSEPH J. MAMMONE, JR must register for a PACER account and/or request the appropriate e-filing rights in the District of Maine via PACER at www.pacer.uscourts.gov by 3/4/2021. NOTE: Counsel appearing Pro Hac Vice MUST click on the PRO HAC VICE link when requesting e-filing rights via PACER. For more details on NextGen/PACER go to our website at www.med.uscourts.gov. (aks) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Joseph J. Mammone, Jr. filed by JAMES R. ERWIN on behalf of DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION (Total admission fee $ 100 receipt number AMEDC-2450181.) The District of Maine is a CM/ECF NextGen Court. If PHV counsel has not previously been granted electronic filing rights with the District of Maine, PHV counsel will now need to submit a PRO HAC VICE request in this District via PACER at www.pacer.uscourts.gov (ERWIN, JAMES) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jill S. Vorobiev filed by JAMES R. ERWIN on behalf of DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION (Total admission fee $ 100 receipt number AMEDC-2450180.) The District of Maine is a CM/ECF NextGen Court. If PHV counsel has not previously been granted electronic filing rights with the District of Maine, PHV counsel will now need to submit a PRO HAC VICE request in this District via PACER at www.pacer.uscourts.gov (ERWIN, JAMES) |
Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMEDC-2450122.), filed by DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION.(ERWIN, JAMES) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION. (bfa) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by DEARBORN NATIONAL. (bfa) |
Filing 3 STATE COURT RECORD and Affidavit by DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 list of attachments, #2 docket record, #3 complaint, #4 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Summons and Complaint)(bfa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bfa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Cumberland County Superior Court, case number PORSC-CV-2020-00556. PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION. (Service of Process Deadline 5/24/2021) Fee due by 2/25/2021.(bfa) |
Set Answer Deadline for DEARBORN NATIONAL, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORP : Answer due by 3/2/2021. (bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.