GRAHAM v. COSTELLO et al
MARK GRAHAM |
CAPTAIN DAVID COSTELLO, LT JORDAN, SGT FLECHER, SGT PHILLIPS, WARDEN-MAJOR, DOCTOR EDDY, ARMOR HEALTHCARE, JUAN, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL OFFICIALS and ELENA USOVA |
2:2021cv00258 |
September 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JON D LEVY |
JOHN C NIVISON |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 11/17/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS) |
Filing 18 ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND COK WARNING re: #5 Report and Recommendations; denying #3 Motion for TRO ; denying 10 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (aks) |
Filing 17 Objection #8 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by MARK GRAHAM. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 16 Objection #7 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by MARK GRAHAM. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 15 Objection #6 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by MARK GRAHAM. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 14 ORDER denying #6 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordinarily, a motion for reconsideration is appropriate only if a moving party presents newly discovered evidence, if there has been an intervening change in the law, or if the moving party can demonstrate that the original decision was based on a manifest error of law or was clearly unjust. In re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 660 F. Supp. 2d 94, 97 (D. Me. 2009). Plaintiff has presented no persuasive evidence or argument that would support a reconsideration of the Court's order directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the form Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The deadline for Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis is extended to October 22, 2021. Any objection to this order shall be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN) |
Set Deadlines: Filing fee or Informa Pauperis Application due by 10/22/2021. (MFS) |
Filing 13 Objection #5 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision.. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 12 Objection #4 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by MARK GRAHAM. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 11 Objection #3 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision filed by MARK GRAHAM. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jgd) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Hearing by MARK GRAHAM (No PDF attached; see pleading #9) (mlm) |
Filing 9 Objection #2 to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by MARK GRAHAM. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mlm) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MARK GRAHAM re #7 Objection to Report and Recommended Decision, #6 MOTION for Reconsideration (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 7 Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by MARK GRAHAM. Response to Objection to Report and Recommendations due by 10/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 R&R, #2 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration by MARK GRAHAM (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aks) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by MARK GRAHAM. Objections to R&R due by 9/29/2021. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS) |
Set Deadlines: Filing Fee or new IFP due by 9/27/2021. (MFS) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by MARK GRAHAM (bfa) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARK GRAHAM (bfa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARMOR HEALTHCARE, DAVID COSTELLO, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL OFFICIALS, EDDY, FLECHER, JORDAN, JUAN, PHILLIPS, ELENA USOVA, WARDEN-MAJOR, filed by MARK GRAHAM. (Service of Process Deadline 12/8/2021) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(bfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.