HART v. SAMSON
Petitioner: ROBERT JAMES HART
Respondent: ERIC SAMSON
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Case Number: 2:2023cv00159
Filed: April 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Presiding Judge: JOHN C NIVISON
Referring Judge: GEORGE Z SINGAL
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT By DEPUTY CLERK: Lindsey Tully. (lrt)
May 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION & GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES re #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION, #5 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION, #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrt)
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Objection to #5 Supplemental Report and Recommended Decision filed by ROBERT JAMES HART. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(lrt)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Amend Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No PDF attached. See ECF No. #5 for Order. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
April 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Objection to Report and Recommended Decision and MOTION to Amend #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ROBERT JAMES HART (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(lrt)
April 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Objections to R&R due by 4/24/2023. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by ROBERT JAMES HART. (jgd)
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ROBERT JAMES HART. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jgd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HART v. SAMSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT JAMES HART
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERIC SAMSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?