BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC v. RKD TRANS INC et al
BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC |
LOAD EM UP INC, RKD TRANS INC and SHYFT GROUP DURAMAG LLC |
2:2024cv00221 |
June 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JOHN C NIVISON |
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by RKD TRANS INC. (SONNEBORN, DANIEL) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting #20 Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Time is extended to August 23, 2024. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN) |
Filing 21 DECLARATION Regarding Consent to Magistrate Judge. The Parties CONSENT to the Magistrate Judge. (KENNEDY, WILLIAM) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Extend Time to Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by SHYFT GROUP DURAMAG LLC Responses due by 9/3/2024. (ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) |
Reset Deadlines as to #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Order 22 : Reply due by 8/23/2024. (mtm) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC. Reply due by 8/19/2024. (KENNEDY, WILLIAM) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC. Reply due by 8/19/2024. (KENNEDY, WILLIAM) |
Filing 17 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SHYFT GROUP DURAMAG LLC. (ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) |
Filing 16 ORDER Re Consent: Declaration Regarding Consent to Magistrate Judge due by 8/14/2024. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Regarding Consent to Magistrate Judge)(cjd) |
Set Deadlines : Per Civil Rule 7.1 as Amended December 1, 2022 Disclosure Statement for Shyft Group Duramag LLC due by 8/7/2024. (cjd) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by SHYFT GROUP DURAMAG LLC Responses due by 8/8/2024. (ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by RKD TRANS INC in support of #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (SONNEBORN, DANIEL) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by RKD TRANS INC Responses due by 8/5/2024. (SONNEBORN, DANIEL) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Amended) by LOAD EM UP INC.(BAKER, WILLIAM) |
Set Answer Deadline for SHYFT GROUP : Answer due by 7/18/2024. (cjd) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Amended Complaint. Time is extended to July 18, 2024. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer by SHYFT GROUP DURAMAG LLC Responses due by 7/31/2024. (ROSENTHAL, DANIEL) |
Filing 9 STATE COURT RECORD with Affidavit by RKD TRANS INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Action Docket Record for Civil Action No. PORSC-CV-2024-00222, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Summary Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Contract Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - Returned Summons Served on RKD Trans, Inc., #6 Exhibit F - Load Em Up Letter to Superior Court Clerk re Failed Service, #7 Exhibit G - Civil Summary Sheet (Amended Complaint), #8 Exhibit H - Contract Case Cover Sheet (Amended Complaint), #9 Exhibit I - Amended Complaint, #10 Exhibit J - Entry of Appearance of Attorney William C. Baker for Defendant Load Em Up, #11 Exhibit K - Defendant Load Em Up, Inc.s Answer, #12 Exhibit L - Defendant R.K.D. Trans, Inc.s Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(SONNEBORN, DANIEL) |
Filing 8 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by LOAD EM UP INC. (BAKER, WILLIAM) |
Set Deadlines: Per Civil Rule 7.1 as Amended December 1, 2022 Disclosure Statement due from LOAD EM UP INC. by 7/8/2024. (mtm) |
Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by RKD TRANS INC. (SONNEBORN, DANIEL) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Amended Complaint. Time is extended to July 15, 2024. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC. (KENNEDY, WILLIAM) |
Filing 4 Defendants' Joint Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer by RKD TRANS INC and LOAD EM UP INC. Responses due by 7/22/2024. (SONNEBORN, DANIEL) Modified on 7/1/2024 to clean up docket text (mtm). Modified on 7/2/2024 to add LOAD EM UP INC. as a filer (mtm). |
Reset Answer Deadline for RKD TRANS INC and LOAD EM UP INC. Pursuant to Order 6 : Answer due by 7/15/2024. (mtm) |
Filing 3 PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: REMOVAL: State Court Record due by 7/8/2024. By DEPUTY CLERK: C. Derrah. (cjd) |
Filing Fee Paid via Credit Card ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMEDC-2970833.), filed by RKD TRANS INC.(SONNEBORN, DANIEL) |
Set Answer Deadline for RKD TRANS INC : Answer due by 7/1/2024. (cjd) |
Set Deadlines : Per Civil Rule 7.1 as Amended December 1, 2022 Disclosure Statement due by 7/1/2024. (cjd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (cjd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from CUMBERLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, case number PORSC-CV-2024-00222. PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by RKD TRANS INC. (Service of Process Deadline 9/19/2024) Fee due by 6/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint)(cjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.