Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Priceline.com, Inc. et al
| Mayor & City Council of Baltimore |
| Priceline.com, Inc., Lowestfare.com, Inc., Travel Web, LLC, Travelport, Inc., Cheaptickets, Inc., Trip Network, Inc., Orbitz, Inc., Expedia, Inc., Hotels.com, Hotels.com, L.P., Hotels.com GP, LLC, Hotwire, Inc., Travelnow.com, Inc., Sabre Holdings Corporation, Travelocity.com, Inc., Travelocity.com, LP, Site59.com, LLC, Does 1 through 1000, Exclusive and Orbitz, LLC |
| 1:2008cv03319 |
| December 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Baltimore City |
| Marvin J. Garbis |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
214
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 200 Motion for Sanctions and Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/21/13. (apls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
210
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 209 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/12/13. (apls, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
181
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 107 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 115 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part 117 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 7/23/12. (apls, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/24/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
