Santos v. Frederick County Board of Commissioners et al
| Roxana Orellana Santos |
| Frederick County Board of Commissioners, Charles Jenkins, Jeffrey Openshaw, John Doe, Julie L. Myers, Calvin McCormick and James A. Dinkins |
| 1:2009cv02978 |
| November 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Frederick |
| Benson Everett Legg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 9/27/18. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 171 Motion for Leave to Take Depositions of Defendants Openshaw and Lynch; directing parties to confer about available dates for the depositions within 7 days. Signed by Judge William M Nickerson on 1/4/2017. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 157 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William M Nickerson on 6/16/2016. (nd2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 8/26/2015. (nd2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Benson Everett Legg on 2/7/2012. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Benson Everett Legg on 8/25/10. (bmh, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
