Barkhorn v. Ports America of Baltimore (Chesapeake) et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Barkhorn
Defendant: Ports America of Baltimore (Chesapeake) and Steamship Trade Association of Baltimore
Case Number: 1:2010cv00750
Filed: March 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
Presiding Judge: William D Quarles
Presiding Judge: William D Quarles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 202 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 195 Motion of plaintiff to vacate, alter or amend judgment; motion for further action; motion to strike; motion to grant deference or weight to the Seniority Agreement Injunction; and motion to grant deference, weight or total judgment to the 14th Amendment Claim in Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 11/4/13. (c/m 11/5/13 jnls, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 11/5/2013 (jnls, Deputy Clerk).
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 132 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 116 Motion of Defendant for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 6/14/2012. (c/m pro se plaintiff Ruff 6/14/2012; bf2, Deputy Clerk)
February 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 129 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing Plaintiff Terry Neblitt as a party for failure to prosecute his claims; denying as moot 115 Motion of Defendant for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Neblitt; referring this matter to a Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings in this Court. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 2/09/2012. (c/m pro se plaintiffs 2/09/2012; bf2, Deputy Clerk)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Terry Neblitt and James Ruff an additional seven days from the date of this Order to file a written response to the Court's order requiring them to state whether they consent to this case being tried and judgment entered by a magistrate judge. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 1/30/2012. (c/m 1/30/2012; bf2, Deputy Clerk)
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 114 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 113 Scheduling Conference. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 12/15/2011. (c/m 12/15/2011; bf2, Deputy Clerk)
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 103 MEMORANDUM signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 9/26/11. (cag, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 9/27/2011 (bf2, Deputy Clerk).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barkhorn v. Ports America of Baltimore (Chesapeake) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Barkhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ports America of Baltimore (Chesapeake)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steamship Trade Association of Baltimore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?