Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien et al v. Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore et al
| St. Brigid's Roman Catholic Congregation Incorporated, Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. and Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Baltimore, and his successors in office, a corporation sole |
| Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Olivia Farrow and Baltimore City Health Department |
| 1:2010cv00760 |
| March 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Marvin J. Garbis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Objections to Memorandum and Order Entered by Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/13/2015. (ca2s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying Defendants requests for documents, except as previously agreed upon by the non-parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 6/16/2015. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 60 Motion to Quash Subpoenas for Deposition & Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 12/23/2014. (bas, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Discovery. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 8/25/14 (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
