Francis Cauffman, LLP v. The Verve Partnership LLC et al
| Francis Cauffman, LLP |
| The Verve Partnership LLC and Kelly W. Ennis |
| 1:2010cv01788 |
| July 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| Baltimore City |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER approving #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Francis Cauffman, LLP. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 7/19/10. (bmh, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Francis Cauffman, LLP (Donald, J) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to J. Wylie Donald, receipt #14637043448, $350.00 filing fee. (bmh, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Correspondence mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (ljs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued 21 days as to Kelly W. Ennis, The Verve Partnership LLC. (ljs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Francis Cauffman, LLP. (ljs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kelly W. Ennis, The Verve Partnership LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14637043448.), filed by Francis Cauffman, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ljs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Jury Trial Demand by Francis Cauffman, LLP. (ljs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
