Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ali
Plaintiff: Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Nadeem Ali
Case Number: 1:2010cv02024
Filed: July 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Baltimore City
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 5/25/11. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
April 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 4/22/11. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
December 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/15/10. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Maurice Michael LaPlaca, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nadeem Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?