Jennings v. The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Plaintiff: Reginald Arthur Jennings
Defendant: The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Case Number: 1:2011cv00715
Filed: March 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Baltimore County
Presiding Judge: Ellen L. Hollander
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/30/12. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 9/28/11. (jmk, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 9/30/11)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennings v. The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Represented By: Lisa A Barkan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Arthur Jennings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?