O.C. Seacrets, Inc., v. Claimants
| In The Matter of The Complaint of O.C. Seacrets, Inc. As Owner of the "Tipsy III" A Rigid-Hulled Inflatable Vessel For Exoneration From or Limitation or Liabilty |
| Claimants |
| 1:2011cv01214 |
| May 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Baltimore Office |
| 99999 |
| Marvin J. Garbis |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: O.C. Seacrets, Inc., v. Claimants | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: In The Matter of The Complaint of O.C. Seacrets, Inc. As Owner of the "Tipsy III" A Rigid-Hulled Inflatable Vessel For Exoneration From or Limitation or Liabilty | |
| Represented By: | Christopher A Abel |
| Represented By: | Tameka M Collier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Claimants | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
