Hudak et al v. The United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Timothy J. Hudak and Katherine L. Hudak |
The United States of America Internal Revenue Service |
1:2011cv01271 |
May 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Baltimore Office |
Baltimore County |
Marvin J. Garbis |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 261 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 242 the United States' Motion for Installment Payment Order & Ancillary Relief. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 6/25/2018. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 194 AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT Denying 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Dwight Mules filed by The United States of America Internal Revenue Service. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 12/21/2015. (bas, Deputy Clerk) . |
Filing 192 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 101 The United States' Motion for Summary Judgment Against Dwight C. Mules. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 12/17/2015. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 100 Motion of USA for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 7/15/13. (jnls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 12/27/12. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 56 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. Signed by Judge Marvin J. Garbis on 12/26/12. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.